For a different approach to handling a closing argument, here's an article that Elliott Wilcox has kindly allowed us to reprint here. It's a different idea to consider in your next case. If you don't subscribe to his Trial Tips Newsletter, I'd highly recommend it.
“The -Best- Closing Argument?”
by Elliott  Wilcox  
How do you structure your closing arguments?  If you're like many attorneys,  you probably take advantage of primacy to start strong and tell the jurors how  strong your case is and show them why you deserve to win.  Normally, that's  exactly how I coach law students and trial lawyers to structure their closings.   “Start strong,” I'll say, “disclose your weaknesses in the middle, and then  finish strong.”
 But...  That's not necessarily the “best” way to outline your closing.
 Trial advocacy is art.  Unlike mathematics or science, where only one correct  answer exists, art doesn't necessarily have a “best” way of doing something.   Working from the same palette, Cézanne, Picasso and Dali each created radically  different depictions of the human form, but none of their masterpieces can  objectively be called “the best.”  
 The same is true of closing arguments.  There are many different approaches,  but we can't objectively say one of them is the “best” way of structuring an  argument.
 So, with that in mind, let me offer another approach for structuring your  closing argument.
 Rather than starting with your strongest argument, then saying  “But, here's the weakness with our case,” you might want to  consider starting with your case weakness before discussing the  strongest part of your case.  That's because the word “but” indicates, “Put  aside what I just said, and pay attention to what I'm about to say.”  
 For example, let's pretend that during your semi-annual review, your boss  tells you, “Overall, your job performance is excellent, but...  your communication skills need improvement.”
 If you're like most people, you probably fixated on the negative portion of  the evaluation, even though the overall evaluation said you were doing an  excellent job.  It's just human nature - when we hear the word “but,” we tune  out the previous statement and focus on what follows.  Don't believe me?  Just  imagine the person you love most in the world telling you, “I love you more than  anything else in the world.  You're the most wonderful person I've ever met.  I  can't imagine life without you.  But...”  
 All it takes is one word and you've completely forgotten about how wonderful  you are, haven't you?
 With that in mind, you may want to reconsider the structure of your closing  argument.  Many cases have been won with arguments that basically said, “We have  a strong case that deserves to win...  BUT, there are a few  weakness in this case that you should know about.”  If you're afraid this  structure may increase the risk of jurors placing greater focus on your case  weaknesses, you may want to re-write your argument like this: “There are a few  weaknesses in this case that you should know about...  BUT, we  have a strong case that deserves to win.”
 You probably won't want to try this format during opening statements, because  at that point the jurors don't know anything about your case yet, and you'll  want to fully maximize the power of Primacy by establishing a strong, positive  image in your jurors' minds.  However, by the time you reach closing arguments,  the jurors have heard all of the testimony and seen all of the exhibits in your  case, so Primacy doesn't play as big a role.
 By the time you reach closings, the only thing left is argument.  By  discussing your weaknesses first before talking about the strength of your case,  you may enhance your credibility with the jury and help them become more  receptive to your arguments.
 The important lesson is that there's no “best” way to craft your closing  argument.  Don't get locked into thinking there's only one way to structure your  arguments or that there's a “magic bullet” that will work in every trial.  Each  trial is different, each client is different, and each jury is different.  As  the trial lawyer, it's your job to discover which structure you should use and  which arguments you should make to create your “masterpiece” closing.  Good  luck!
Elliott Wilcox publishes Trial Tips Newsletter.  Sign up today for  your free subscription and a copy of his special reports: “How to  Successfully Make & Meet Objections” and “The Ten Critical Mistakes  Trial Lawyers Make (and how to avoid them)” at www.TrialTheater.com